> photograph should be saved in a gif format. > But frankly, there's absolutely no reason that I can think of, that a when downloading it actually takes on a png format, but is still severely color-truncated. Zooming in it is quite noticeable, and makes the one on your site the lower quality image.īut at 100% view, they're close enough to be twins.īut frankly, there's absolutely no reason that I can think of, that a photograph should be saved in a gif format. What is not equal is the gif format's dithering of the image on your site. In fact bringing the images into Photoshop, there is literally an equal color match across both of them. Or it's just going to continue to compress an already compressed color gamut.īut as I said, I see no visual difference between these images, so it could be an issue with the browsers used and file formats chosen. Gifs limit color information, and a jpg version may have trouble re-allocating colors to a larger color space. You might try looking at the image on your site against a white background, that sort of optical illusion can mess with perception.Īlso, the image on your site is a gif format, while the one on Flickr is likely a jpg, even if you uploaded a gif. I see literally no difference between the two images you linked to (using Chrome browser). The quality of the image on flickr is not extremely poor, in my very humble judgment. The woman's blouse appeals more to me here because of the colors, but that's a preference it may be that the other photo is more nearly like the original subjects, but I can't know that. I've got windows open on both photos, and there are differences, but I'm not willing to call either one "bad." The colors in the flickr version are darker, some might say richer, while the blogspot copy has lighter, pastel colors of the subjects' faces. Though I have to say I agree with the comment on your photo page, the copy here on Flickr looks much nicer/better than the one on your site. Only the original upload size is left untouched by Flickr.Īll other sizes are sharpened and reduced in size (both in dimensions and file), which can explain the difference in quality. Note the extremely poor quality on flickr? I'd upgrade but now I'm not sure. I've posted an image on my site here and here on flickr. There are no posts from the people you follow right nowĬan not see my last "item" posted in a group!Īlbum cover image keeps changing and private albums going public view Welcome to the Flickr Help Forum! Click here to get started and to read our Flickr forever: Creating the safest most inclusive This thread was closed automatically due to a lack of responses over the last month.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |