![]() ![]() ![]() They want to hunt fish that are entering mating time, especially cod. ![]() Since more than 1,000 years ago, traditional Scandinavian fishermen would flock to the ocean on the north side of Norway every winter. His level of genius far surpassed the achievements of the strongest Grandmaster. If you can memorize all the best responses, you will win or at least make a draw.Like the dried cod from the Vikings, the most powerful chess engine in the world today, Stockfish, is made in Norway, then cooked in Italy. With all the probability of winning for each move being KNOWN these days, very soon it will be openings, openings, openings, openings. An opening theory for a chess engine is probably about like the first 30 moves ahead or more. For computer chess engines, it is like openings, openings, openings, strategic rules and searching speed. In the old days, they talked about openings, mid game, and end game. As Bobby Fisher once said, chess is really a game of memory. Of course, modern search algorithms are much stronger in the sense that they take advantage of the new hardware design that specializes in doing some calculations. It is all about memory and computing speed. It will take an entire blitz game to decide upon one move, I suppose. If you use a good old 80286 with 16K RAM, the answer is no. All modern chess programs take advantage of the newest CPU and GPU in conducting searches. There is a Youtube video where we can see Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (who is or was blitz champion in 3m+2s per move) lose against a 2100 bot from Komodo in 5m+5s so even if it's not the case in many video games, in chess bots can be very efficient to win or not to lose.Ĭan stockfish beat Magnus Carsen? It really depends on the hardware. Otherwise in my opinion even an old program like Fritz 5.32 or Frtiz 6 even without its opening encyclopedia can beat and is stronger than any human in blitz (3m, 5m, 3m+2s per move) There is CARLSEN VS STOCKFISH! CHEATING Against Magnus Carlsen in Blitz Game (Youtube video) where Magnus Carlsen doesn't use any anti-computer technique and he proves that he is capable of potentially drawing games with white against Stockfisch. Although in saying that, If it were to happen, I think Magnus would lose quite a few games before he could make one of those draws happen. IF he does achieve that, I think Magnus would have the skill to draw it. lets say Stockfish and Magnus play a game with no set position, just a normal game, and Magnus tries to play a game where all the pawns get locked. The fact that it can't be drawn is just not as obvious as it may appear at first sight, because depending on the position it may be forced. So yes, if a top engine knows that it's playing against a human, and is not forced to play from pre-determined positions (like in computer chess competitions), then it will win every time. Stockfish, for example, has a 'contempt' setting that lets it avoid drawish positions (that is, the computer will go for a slightly worse but unbalancing move in such situations, because it will beat any human from an unbalanced position, even if it initially evaluates it as worse). Of course this can be avoided by the engine by having built-in settings to avoid such situations against humans. And what is for me a drawn K+P vs K endgame, for a super GM it may be a certain position out of the Berlin opening. For example, even I can draw a drawn K+P vs K endgame against Stockfish, but Stockfish won't let me get there. There is also an interesting discussion on this on Quora. If you can get the computer to get into some drawish lines early on, then a strong grandmaster can hold a draw. With 'default settings', a draw is not completely out of question. Of course any human has 0% chance of beating an engine, but when it comes to draws, it's not that simple. But no, unfortunately, the engine is much better than Magnus and he will get destroyed. That used to be possible 20 years ago, as shown by Garry Kasparov. You dont think if Magnus played a strategic game where he locked position that he could draw? Grandmasters have no hope against computers anymore. It's in an entirely different universe of strength. But no, Magnus, playing stockfish 14 on modern hardware, say a 2021 gaming computer, could play it as many times as he could for the rest of his life, and he'd never beat Stockfish. It's used as the ANSWER to what we should do or what we should have done. Stockfish isn't used for competition now. ![]() Now it really doesn't occur to us that it's even debatable. Ten years ago we reached the point where asking that question is about the same as asking if Usain Bolt beat.a car. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |